ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Storytelling as narrative health promotion in community psychiatry: a quasi-experimental study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-based psychiatric rehabilitation (CBPR) helps patients reintegrate into society while enabling them to live autonomously in supportive environments. CBPR uses multi-modal approach to address patients' needs in health, education, livelihood, empowerment and social functioning. In addition to pharmacotherapy, other interventions such as metacognitive training, lifestyle interventions, psychoeducation, arts therapy may be used to improve functioning and quality of life. Storytelling as a new intervention was implemented in a community-based rehabilitation setting with patients with mental health issues to test its feasibility and potential to improve life satisfaction.
methodsStories presenting difficult lives and complicated relationships were narrated and discussed in eight storytelling sessions for members of a civil organization involved in psychiatric rehabilitation in four months. Acceptability was tested by following participation rate and feedback with scales after each session. Demographic as well as mental health data including sense of coherence, distress, self-efficacy, and life satisfaction were investigated by standard scales before the first and after the last session.
resultsParticipation ranged from 31 to 49% compared to all persons present at the setting. Participants (mean age: 53.41 ± 12.23 years, 63% females) found the stories highly interesting (mean: 8.93 ± 1.62) and comprehensible (8.67 ± 1.9) on a 1-10 scale though the means of individual sessions somewhat varied. Significant positive correlation was found between the stories being interesting and comprehensible (Spearman's rho = 0.656) but significant negative correlation was found between story length and comprehension (Spearman's rho=-0.183). Based on the responses from participants who completed the questionnaires before and after the intervention, life satisfaction significantly increased. Psychological variables such as self-efficacy, sense of coherence, pathological distress showed improving tendency without reaching significance. Pre-intervention data showed significant positive correlation between self-efficacy and sense of coherence (Pearson's r = 0.659). Psychological distress was negatively related to both self-efficacy (Pearson's r=-0.728) and sense of coherence (Pearson's r=-0.825).
conclusionsStorytelling as a means for promoting health proved to be feasible in a group of rehabilitated patients with mental disorders. Their life satisfaction significantly improved in four months. Carefully selected stories narrated and discussed in group settings may result in the gradual shift of participants' perspectives leading to improved life satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.