Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40229639›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2025

A quasi-experimental comparison of Kolb and Peyton educational approaches on CPR knowledge and performance among nurses.

Marzieh Abbasi, Mohsen Taghadosi, Fatemeh Atoof, Reza Hosseiniara

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07530822 (The Effect Of Prenatal Care Training Using The Peyton Model On Midwifery Students' Knowledge, Skills, Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, And Satisfaction Levels), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07530822 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect Of Prenatal Care Training Using The Peyton Model On Midwifery Students' Knowledge, Skills, Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, And Satisfaction Levels

TypeinterventionalSponsorSaglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRan2025 to 2026Enrolled64ConditionsPrenatal Care, Midwifery Education, Clinical Self-Efficacy, AnxietyArmsPeyton Model Training, Standard Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marzieh AbbasiSurgical Nursing, Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
Mohsen TaghadosiNursing Education, Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trauma Nursing Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, 5th of Qotb-e Ravandi Blvd, P.O.Box: 8715988141, Kashan, Iran. taghadosi_m@kaums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9782-0862
Fatemeh AtoofBiostatistics, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
Reza HosseiniaraResearch Center for Biochemistry and Nutrition in Metabolic Diseases, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany nurses lack adequate knowledge and skills in CPR. Studies have yielded varying results regarding the effectiveness of Kolb and Peyton education methods on nurses' performance in CPR.

aimsThe present study aims to compare the effects of education based on Kolb and Peyton methods on nurses' CPR knowledge and performance.

methodsIn a quasi-experimental study conducted in 2019, 108 nurses from Kashan's hospitals meeting the inclusion criteria were selected through convenience sampling. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: Kolb, Peyton, and a control group. Data collection tools included a demographics form and a research-made questionnaire assessing nurses' knowledge and performance in CPR. Participants completed the questionnaire before the intervention, as well as one- and six-weeks post-intervention. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 19, employing Chi-square and repeated measures ANOVA (p ≤ 0.05).

resultsThe three groups were homogeneous in terms of demographics, except for age (p = 0.001) and work experience (p = 0.001). While mean knowledge scores in the Kolb and Peyton groups showed statistically significant increases over time (pre-intervention, one-week post-intervention, and six-weeks post-intervention) (p = 0.001 for Kolb, p = 0.000 for Peyton), there was no statistically significant difference in overall knowledge scores between the three groups at any time point (p = 0.06 at six weeks post-intervention, p = 0.32 at one-week post-intervention, and p = 0.36 pre-intervention). Regarding CPR skills, cardiac massage, (p = 0.001 for Kolb, p = 0.001 for Peyton), breathing (p = 0.01 for Kolb, p = 0.001 for Peyton), and defibrillator skills (p = 0.01 for Kolb, p = 0.01 for Peyton) demonstrated statistically significant improvements in both the Kolb and Peyton groups. Furthermore, comparison of these skills among the three groups revealed that the Peyton method was statistically significantly more effective than the Kolb method (p = 0.001 for cardiac massage, p = 0.01 for breathing, and p = 0.01 for defibrillator skills).

conclusionNurses who received education based on Kolb and Peyton exhibited enhanced knowledge and skills (cardiac massage, breathing, and defibrillator) in CPR. The implementation of these innovative educational methods for CPR training among nurses is recommended.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationClinical CompetenceEducation, Nursing, ContinuingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNursing Staff, HospitalAdultEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesCardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)EducationKnowledgeKolbPerformancePeyton

Identifiers

PMID40229639
PMCPMC11998466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.