ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Racial Disparities in Septic Shock Outcomes: A Nationwide Analysis (2016-2020).
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe mortality rate and outcomes of septic shock can vary, depending on the patient's race. The most comprehensive national study on these racial disparities is dated, and recent studies have reported mixed findings.
objectiveTo gain insight into racial variation in outcomes of septic shock and understand underlying factors.
designA retrospective analysis using National Inpatient Sample data (2016-2020). Patients were grouped by race, and patient and hospital characteristics, outcomes, and complications were compared. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. PATIENTS: Hospitalized patients aged ≥ 18 years with septic shock. MAIN MEASURES: In-hospital mortality, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, acute kidney injury, need for hemodialysis, acute myocardial infarction, requirement for blood transfusion, length of stay, the financial burden on healthcare, and resource utilization. KEY
resultsAmong 2,789,890 patients, 67.5% were White, 14.4% Black, 10.9% Hispanic, 3.3% Asian or Pacific Islander, and 0.8% Native American; 46.2% were aged > 70 years. Compared to White patients, Black patients had 23% higher odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.23, 95% CI 1.21-1.25) and the highest odds of invasive mechanical ventilation (aOR 1.42) and hemodialysis (aOR 1.96). Native American patients had the highest odds of acute respiratory distress syndrome (aOR 2.03), while Asian or Pacific Islander patients had increased odds of blood transfusions (aOR 1.52). Palliative care consultations were less common among Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients compared to White patients.
conclusionsRacial disparities persist in septic shock outcomes, with higher mortality and complications among Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American patients, along with less utilization of palliative care services compared to White patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.