Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40229594›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2025

Influence of preoperative indwelling urinary catheter on outcomes of high-power holmium laser enucleation for very large prostate (≥ 200 mL).

Matteo Tallè, Carlo Giulioni, Alessio Papaveri, Francesco Mengoni, Roberto Orciani, Savio Domenico Pandolfo, Ciro Imbimbo, Felice Crocetto, Daniele Castellani, Thomas Herrmann and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Matteo Tallè *Department of Urology, Casa di Cura Villa Igea, Ancona, 60127, Italy.
Carlo Giulioni *Department of Urology, Casa di Cura Villa Igea, Ancona, 60127, Italy. carlo.giulioni9@gmail.com.
Alessio PapaveriDepartment of Urology, Casa di Cura Villa Igea, Ancona, 60127, Italy.
Francesco MengoniDepartment of Urology, Casa di Cura Villa Igea, Ancona, 60127, Italy.
Roberto OrcianiDepartment of Urology, Casa di Cura Villa Igea, Ancona, 60127, Italy.
Savio Domenico PandolfoDepartment of Urology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, 67100, Italy.
Ciro ImbimboDepartment of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "ederico II", Naples, 80131, Italy.
Felice CrocettoDepartment of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "ederico II", Naples, 80131, Italy.
Daniele CastellaniUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, 60126, Italy.
Thomas HerrmannDepartment of Urology, Spital Thurgau AG, Kantonsspital Frauenfeld, Pfaffenholzstrasse 4, Frauenfeld, 8501, CH, Switzerland.
Vineet GauharDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, 126817, Singapore.
Angelo CafarelliDepartment of Urology, Casa di Cura Villa Igea, Ancona, 60127, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeto evaluate the impact of Indwelling Urinary Catheters (IUC) on perioperative and functional outcomes, as well as the safety profile, of High-Power HoLEP for the treatment of prostate gland volumes exceeding 200 cc.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 237 patients with prostate volumes > 200 cc who underwent HoLEP between January 2016 and December 2022. Patients were included based on specific criteria, such as an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) > 7 and a maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) < 15 mL/s. Patients were categorized into two groups: Group 1 included those with IUC prior to surgery, while Group 2 comprised patients without it.

resultsA total of 237 patients with prostate volumes exceeding 200 cc underwent HoLEP, and were categorized into Group 1 (n = 63) and Group 2 (n = 174), with Group 1 exhibiting higher Charlson Comorbidity Index and BMI. Postoperative outcomes indicated a higher incidence of urinary tract infections in Group 1, as well as worse IPSS, Qmax, and PVR at 3 months; however, by the 1-year follow-up, both groups demonstrated comparable results. Longitudinal analysis revealed that both groups experienced significant functional and symptomatic improvements over time, with Group 2 showing rapid early gains that stabilized, whereas Group 1 exhibited continuous improvement from 3 months to 1 year.

conclusionHoLEP is an effective treatment for very large prostate volumes in patients with IUC. Although these patients are at a higher risk for UTI and initial lower Qmax, these outcomes improve by one year.

Indexed as

Catheters, IndwellingLasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyProstateProstatectomyProstatic HyperplasiaUrinary CathetersAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan SizePostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative CareRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBPHHigh-power holepIndwelling urinary catheterVery large prostate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.