ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025
Speaking of survival: oncologists' approaches to risk behavior conversations with cancer survivors.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study explored oncologists' reported conversations with adult cancer survivors about three modifiable risk behaviors: poor diet, smoking, and insufficient physical activity. These behaviors can increase disease recurrence and early mortality. By asking oncologists to report their approach to these discussions, we can begin to identify areas for improvement.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 oncology clinicians from various subspecialties. We identified themes using inductive thematic analysis.
resultsFour major themes were identified. Participants reported only sometimes explicitly discussing risk behaviors and avoiding sensitive topics like weight. They described tailoring their conversations around what they believe a patient can handle to maintain a positive relationship or avoid hurting patients' self-image. Participants explained that they rely on specialists or programs for specific risk management strategies and indicated that patients most often initiate conversations about lifestyle risks. Participants avoided or indirectly discussed lifestyle risks.
conclusionThe oncologists' reported risk communication with survivors suggested a delicate balance between patient-centered communication and benevolent bias-where oncologists tailor conversations based on their perceptions of what a patient can handle. Indirect discussions may lead survivors to undervalue the importance of addressing these risks. To enhance communication effectiveness and avoid unmanaged risk behaviors, oncologists need support to be more fully engaged in specific risk management conversations with cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Oncologists' benevolent bias may lead to inadequate risk management by the clinician and result in survivors underestimating the importance of specific risk factors, potentially leading to poorer health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40229583What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.