Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40229570›Full record

ArticleOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2025

[Upper extremity immobilization techniques in children].

Nadine Kaiser, Teddy Slongo

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nadine KaiserAbteilung für Kinderorthopädie/Kindertraumatologie, Kinderchirurgische Universitätsklinik, Inselspital, Freiburgstr., 3010, Bern, Schweiz. nadine.kaiser@insel.ch.
Teddy SlongoAbteilung für Kinderorthopädie/Kindertraumatologie, Kinderchirurgische Universitätsklinik, Inselspital, Freiburgstr., 3010, Bern, Schweiz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveConservative treatment of stable fractures of the upper extremity in children. INDICATIONS: Undisplaced and age-tolerable displaced fractures of the hand, forearm, and elbow. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Open fractures. TREATMENT OPTIONS: Forearm splint/forearm cast for stable injuries to the radius or ulna. Long arm splint/long arm cast for injuries to the radius and ulna and after reduction of the forearm, as well as for stable, undisplaced injuries to the elbow. Intrinsic plus splint for injuries to the four fingers (excluding the thumb) and metacarpus. FURTHER TREATMENT: For stable injuries, immobilization for analgesia for 3-4 weeks. Clinical check after treatment. In the case of repositioned fractures or fractures displaced within the spontaneous correction limits, clinical-radiological control (if necessary, with cast wedging) after 1 week. Immobilization for 4 weeks (prepubertal children) or 5 weeks (pubertal children).

resultsConservative treatment of fractures of the upper extremity is still the gold standard today. In pediatric patients in particular, but also in adult patients, correct healing of the fracture with good analgesia can be achieved with manageable effort and a good cost-benefit ratio through correct cast immobilization. A measurable parameter for monitoring a good cast is the cast index.

Indexed as

Arm InjuriesCasts, SurgicalFracture FixationFractures, BoneImmobilizationSplintsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleFracture HealingHumansInfantMaleRadius FracturesChildConservative treatmentElbow fractureForearm fracturePlaster cast

Identifiers

PMID40229570
PMCPMC12137532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.