ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Deep learning for video-based assessment of endotracheal intubation skills.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndotracheal intubation (ETI) is an emergency procedure performed in civilians and combat casualty care settings to establish an airway. It's crucial that healthcare personnel are proficient in these skills, which traditionally have been evaluated through direct feedback from experts. Unfortunately, this method can be inconsistent and subjective, requiring considerable time and resources.
methodsThis study introduces a system for assessing ETI skills using video analysis. The system employs advanced video processing techniques, including a 2D convolutional autoencoder (AE) based on a self-supervision model, capable of recognizing complex patterns in videos. A 1D convolutional model enhanced with a cross-view attention module then uses AE features to make assessments. Data for the study was gathered in two phases, focusing first on comparisons between experts and novices, and then examining how novices perform under time constraints with outcomes labeled as either successful or unsuccessful. A separate set of data using videos from head-mounted cameras was also analyzed.
resultsThe system successfully distinguishes between experts and novices in initial trials and demonstrates high accuracy in further classifications, including under time pressure and using head-mounted camera footage.
conclusionsThis system's ability to accurately differentiate between experts and novices instills confidence in its effectiveness and potential to improve training and certification processes for healthcare providers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.