ArticleScientific reports2025
Prenatal diagnosis of imprinted associated chromosome abnormalities identified by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT).
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prenatal Genetic Testing for Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome: Considerations, Challenges and Observations (A Real-World Study).Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To explore the clinical value of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) combined with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA)/copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq), methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the early screening of imprinted chromosome abnormalities. We retrospectively studied the prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy outcomes of 9 pregnant women with imprinted associated chromosome abnormalities via NIPT. All pregnant women received detailed genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis. Karyotyping analysis, CNV-seq, CMA, FISH or MS-MLPA were performed on the amniotic fluid samples. We collected the intrauterine phenotypes via ultrasound and followed them up until the induction of labor or one year after birth. Six fetuses (6 out of 9) were diagnosed with regional abnormalities of Imprinting Disease. The most commonly diagnosed syndrome was 15q11-q13 duplication syndrome ( 3 out of 6), followed by mosaic trisomy 7 (2 out of 6) and Temple syndrome (1 out of 6). The other three fetuses (3 out of 9) were diagnosed with absence of heterozygosity (AOH). After genetic counselling, 4 pregnant women (4 out of 9) chose induced labor, 3 pregnant women (3 out of 9) chose spontaneous labor, and 2 pregnant women (2 out of 9) chose cesarean section. The widespread use of NIPT in prenatal screening provides more opportunities to detect rare chromosome aneuploidies (RCAs) and microdeletion/microduplication syndromes (MMSs) in mid-pregnancy. The combination of NIPT and other prenatal diagnostic technologies can help increase the possibility of detecting imprinting-related diseases with no phenotype or a late phenotype in utero.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.