ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Leveraging pretrained language models for seizure frequency extraction from epilepsy evaluation reports.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modern generative large language models in epilepsy care: a scoping review of current applications, challenges, and future directions.Acta epileptologica · 2026Review
- Evaluating large language models for diagnostic reasoning from unstructured clinical narratives in epilepsy.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Automated epilepsy and seizure type phenotyping with pre-trained language models.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Comparing three natural language processing methods for the automatic identification of epilepsy patients from French clinical notes.Epilepsia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Seizure frequency is essential for evaluating epilepsy treatment, ensuring patient safety, and reducing risk for Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy. As this information is often described in clinical narratives, this study presents an approach to extracting structured seizure frequency details from such unstructured text. We investigated two tasks: (1) extracting phrases describing seizure frequency, and (2) extracting seizure frequency attributes. For both tasks, we fine-tuned three BERT-based models (bert-large-cased, biobert-large-cased, and Bio_ClinicalBERT), as well as three generative large language models (GPT-4, GPT-3.5 Turbo, and Llama-2-70b-hf). The final structured output integrated the results from both tasks. GPT-4 attained the best performance across all tasks with precision, recall, and F1-score of 86.61%, 85.04%, and 85.79% respectively for frequency phrase extraction; 90.23%, 93.51%, and 91.84% for seizure frequency attribute extraction; and 86.64%, 85.06%, and 85.82% for the final structured output. These findings highlight the potential of fine-tuned generative models in extractive tasks from limited text strings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.