ArticleCell death and differentiation2025
Targeting the poliovirus receptor to activate T cells and induce myeloid-derived suppressor cells to differentiate to pro-inflammatory macrophages via the IFN-γ-p-STAT1-IRF8 axis in cancer therapy.
Article in Cell death and differentiation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virus-like particles in cancer immunotherapy: bridging human and veterinary medicine through one health.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Review
- KDM6B enhances anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy efficacy by increasing CD8Journal of Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) is one of the most important immune checkpoints expressed on lymphocytes, and poliovirus receptor (PVR, also CD155) serves as the most crucial ligand for TIGIT, harboring an important function in cancer cells and influencing the tumor microenvironment (TME). While it's well-established that TIGIT blockade could reverse immunosuppression, the question of whether direct inhibition of PVR yields comparable results remains to be fully elucidated. This study investigated the role of PVR within the TME on the LLC, CT26 and MC38 tumor models and found that direct blockade of PVR on tumor cells could trigger T cell activation, enhance the production of immunostimulatory cytokine IFN-γ, and drive the differentiation of intratumoral myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) into pro-inflammatory macrophages through the IFN-γ-p-STAT1-IRF8 axis. Furthermore, this study found that the anti-PVR nanobody monotherapy reduced tumor volume in the CT26 and MC38 tumor models. Combination of anti-PVR nanobody and anti-PD-1 antibody was effective in the LLC, CT26 and MC38 tumor models and had acceptable toxicity. These findings collectively suggest that PVR exhibits considerable promise as a therapeutic target in the development of immunotherapies aimed at augmenting the anti-tumor immune response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.