Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40229435›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A hybrid learning network with progressive resizing and PCA for diagnosis of cervical cancer on WSI slides.

Nitin Kumar Chauhan, Krishna Singh, Amit Kumar, Ashutosh Mishra, Sachin Kumar Gupta, Shubham Mahajan, Seifedine Kadry, Jungeun Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nitin Kumar ChauhanDepartment of ECE, Indore Institute of Science & Technology, Indore, 453331, India.
Krishna SinghDSEU Okhla Campus-I, Formerly G. B. Pant Engineering College, New Delhi, 110020, India.
Amit KumarDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, 221005, India.
Ashutosh MishraDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS), Pilani Dubai Campus, 345055, Dubai International Academic City, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Sachin Kumar GuptaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Central University of Jammu, Samba, Jammu, 181143, India.
Shubham MahajanAmity School of Engineering & Technology, Amity University, Haryana, India. mahajanshubham2232579@gmail.com.
Seifedine KadryDepartment of Computer Science and Mathematics, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Jungeun KimDepartment of Computer Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea. jekim@inha.ac.kr.

Funding

Kongju National University 2020R1I1A3069700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current artificial intelligence (AI) trends are revolutionizing medical image processing, greatly improving cervical cancer diagnosis. Machine learning (ML) algorithms can discover patterns and anomalies in medical images, whereas deep learning (DL) methods, specifically convolutional neural networks (CNNs), are extremely accurate at identifying malignant lesions. Deep models that have been pre-trained and tailored through transfer learning and fine-tuning become faster and more effective, even when data is scarce. This paper implements a state-of-the-art Hybrid Learning Network that combines the Progressive Resizing approach and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for enhanced cervical cancer diagnostics of whole slide images (WSI) slides. ResNet-152 and VGG-16, two fine-tuned DL models, are employed together with transfer learning to train on augmented and progressively resized training data with dimensions of 224 × 224, 512 × 512, and 1024 × 1024 pixels for enhanced feature extraction. Principal component analysis (PCA) is subsequently employed to process the combined features extracted from two DL models and reduce the dimensional space of the feature set. Furthermore, two ML methods, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) models, are trained on this reduced feature set, and their predictions are integrated using a majority voting approach for evaluating the final classification results, thereby enhancing overall accuracy and reliability. The accuracy of the suggested framework on SIPaKMeD data is 99.29% for two-class classification and 98.47% for five-class classification. Furthermore, it achieves 100% accuracy for four-class categorization on the LBC dataset.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAlgorithmsDeep LearningFemaleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPrincipal Component AnalysisCervical CancerDeep learningMachine learningMajority voting classifierPrincipal component analysisProgressive resizing

Identifiers

PMID40229435
PMCPMC11997219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.