ArticleScientific reports2025
A hybrid learning network with progressive resizing and PCA for diagnosis of cervical cancer on WSI slides.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A lightweight ResNet50V2-ECA model for renal cell carcinoma grading: efficiency, calibration, and state-of-the-art performance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence with pyramid vision transformer model for multi-class malignant cell classification on cytology slides.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Reinforcement learning-based WSI diagnostic system for cervical squamous cell carcinoma and precancerous lesions.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Joint segmentation and classification of cervical cells using U-Net and CNN ensemble for early detection of cervical cancer.Cancer cell international · 2026Article
- MGWO-CNN: hyperparameter optimization of CNN classifier for cervical cancer detection using Modified Grey Wolf Optimizer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A hybrid vision transformer with ensemble CNN framework for cervical cancer diagnosis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Advancements in fusion-based deep representation learning for enhanced cervical precancerous lesion classification using biomedical image analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- WHFDL: an explainable method based on World Hyper-heuristic and Fuzzy Deep Learning approaches for gastric cancer detection using metabolomics data.BioData mining · 2025Article
- A hybrid compound scaling hypergraph neural network for robust cervical cancer subtype classification using whole slide cytology images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current artificial intelligence (AI) trends are revolutionizing medical image processing, greatly improving cervical cancer diagnosis. Machine learning (ML) algorithms can discover patterns and anomalies in medical images, whereas deep learning (DL) methods, specifically convolutional neural networks (CNNs), are extremely accurate at identifying malignant lesions. Deep models that have been pre-trained and tailored through transfer learning and fine-tuning become faster and more effective, even when data is scarce. This paper implements a state-of-the-art Hybrid Learning Network that combines the Progressive Resizing approach and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for enhanced cervical cancer diagnostics of whole slide images (WSI) slides. ResNet-152 and VGG-16, two fine-tuned DL models, are employed together with transfer learning to train on augmented and progressively resized training data with dimensions of 224 × 224, 512 × 512, and 1024 × 1024 pixels for enhanced feature extraction. Principal component analysis (PCA) is subsequently employed to process the combined features extracted from two DL models and reduce the dimensional space of the feature set. Furthermore, two ML methods, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) models, are trained on this reduced feature set, and their predictions are integrated using a majority voting approach for evaluating the final classification results, thereby enhancing overall accuracy and reliability. The accuracy of the suggested framework on SIPaKMeD data is 99.29% for two-class classification and 98.47% for five-class classification. Furthermore, it achieves 100% accuracy for four-class categorization on the LBC dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.