Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40229413›Full record

Trial reportOral and maxillofacial surgery2025

Does ozone gel enhance the bone width and buccal plate of bone thickness surrounding the implant following osseodensification? A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Dina Yousry, Raafat Riad, Rehab A Soliman, Mohamed ElSholkamy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06604819 (The Impact of Ozone Gel on the Bone Height and Density After Closed Sinus Lifting with Simultaneous Implant Placement), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06604819 nacompletednot on this map

The Impact of Ozone Gel on the Bone Height and Density After Closed Sinus Lifting with Simultaneous Implant Placement: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSuez Canal UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled19ConditionsSinus PneumatizationArmsOzone gel placed after closed sinus lifting then implant placed simultaneously., closed sinus lifting using osteotomes with simultaneous implant placement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dina YousryOral & Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt. dina.yousry@miuegypt.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7140-5855
Raafat RiadOral & Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2076-0544
Rehab A SolimanOral & Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9713-8510
Mohamed ElSholkamyOral & Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0367-6573

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of using ozone gel with transcrestal sinus elevation using osteotomes, on the bone width and the buccal plate of bone thickness around the implants placed simultaneously. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 30 sinuses with an average residual alveolar bone height ranging from 4-7 mm participated in this randomized controlled clinical trial. Following a closed sinus lift procedure, patients were randomized into two groups: one for the ozone gel recipient group and the other for control group. Cone beam computed tomography was carried out both immediately and four months postoperatively. Radiographic evaluations were performed to assess bone width and labial plate thickness at both crestal and midcrestal levels.

resultsRadiographic analysis revealed that the mean bone width of the control group after four months postoperative was (8.54 ± 1.46 mm) compared to (8.96 ± 1.66 mm) in the study group, which was statistically insignificant (P ≤ .0.05). The mean labial plate of bone thickness value of the control group after four months postoperative was (1.86 ± 0.63 mm) compared to (1.89 ± 0.51 mm) in the study group. Although the bone dimensions in the study group was higher than the control group, it was statistically insignificant (P ≤ .0.05).

conclusionWhen compared to the graftless group, the ozone gel recipient group showed non-significant difference in the results in terms of bone width and thickness. Both methods, nevertheless, produced outcomes that were acceptable.

trial registrationThis study protocol was retrospectively registered on the trial registry "Clinical trials.gov PRS". CLINICALTRIALS: gov ID is: NCT06604819 and the registration date is 20/9/2024.

Indexed as

Alveolar ProcessDental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsOsseointegrationOzoneSinus Floor AugmentationAdultCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleGelsHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeDental ImplantsGelsOzoneBiomaterialsBone augmentationCBCT imagingClinical researchClosed sinus liftingImplantologyMaxillary sinus floor elevationOsteotomesSimultaneous implantsTranscrestal sinus floor elevation

Identifiers

PMID40229413
PMCPMC11996989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.