ArticleMolecular psychiatry2025
Population-level individualized prospective prediction of opioid overdose using machine learning.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI and Machine Learning Terminology in Medicine, Psychology, and Social Sciences: Tutorial and Practical Recommendations.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The opioid overdose epidemic has rapidly expanded in North America, with rates accelerating during the COVID-19 pandemic. No existing study has demonstrated prospective opioid overdose at a population level. This study aimed to develop and validate a population-level individualized prospective prediction model of opioid overdose (OpOD) using machine learning (ML) and de-identified provincial administrative health data. The OpOD prediction model was based on a cohort of approximately 4 million people in 2017 to predict OpOD cases in 2018 and was subsequently tested on cohort data from 2018, 2019, and 2020 to predict OpOD cases in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. The model's predictive performance, including balanced accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (AUC), was evaluated, achieving a balanced accuracy of 83.7, 81.6, and 85.0% in each respective year. The leading predictors for OpOD, which were derived from health care utilization variables documented by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) and physician billing claims, were treatment encounters for drug or alcohol use, depression, neurotic/anxiety/obsessive-compulsive disorder, and superficial skin injury. The main contribution of our study is to demonstrate that ML-based individualized OpOD prediction using existing population-level data can provide accurate prediction of future OpOD cases in the whole population and may have the potential to inform targeted interventions and policy planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.