Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40229401›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2025

Population-level individualized prospective prediction of opioid overdose using machine learning.

Yang S Liu, Derek V Pierce, Dan Metes, Yipeng Song, Lawrence Kiyang, Mengzhe Wang, Kathryn Dong, Dean T Eurich, Scott Patten, Russell Greiner and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yang S Liu *Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0406-8056
Derek V Pierce *Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Dan MetesAnalytics and Performance Reporting Branch, Ministry of Health, Government of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Yipeng SongDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Lawrence KiyangAnalytics and Performance Reporting Branch, Ministry of Health, Government of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Mengzhe WangAnalytics and Performance Reporting Branch, Ministry of Health, Government of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Kathryn DongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0843-4618
Dean T EurichSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Scott PattenDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9871-4041
Russell GreinerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8327-934X
Yanbo ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Jake HaywardDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Andrew GreenshawDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Bo CaoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. cloudbocao@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9338-3271

Funding

Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (Brain & Behavior Research Foundation) 31516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The opioid overdose epidemic has rapidly expanded in North America, with rates accelerating during the COVID-19 pandemic. No existing study has demonstrated prospective opioid overdose at a population level. This study aimed to develop and validate a population-level individualized prospective prediction model of opioid overdose (OpOD) using machine learning (ML) and de-identified provincial administrative health data. The OpOD prediction model was based on a cohort of approximately 4 million people in 2017 to predict OpOD cases in 2018 and was subsequently tested on cohort data from 2018, 2019, and 2020 to predict OpOD cases in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. The model's predictive performance, including balanced accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (AUC), was evaluated, achieving a balanced accuracy of 83.7, 81.6, and 85.0% in each respective year. The leading predictors for OpOD, which were derived from health care utilization variables documented by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) and physician billing claims, were treatment encounters for drug or alcohol use, depression, neurotic/anxiety/obsessive-compulsive disorder, and superficial skin injury. The main contribution of our study is to demonstrate that ML-based individualized OpOD prediction using existing population-level data can provide accurate prediction of future OpOD cases in the whole population and may have the potential to inform targeted interventions and policy planning.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseMachine LearningOpiate OverdoseAdultAnalgesics, OpioidCanadaCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersProspective StudiesROC CurveAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID40229401
PMCPMC12339362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.