ArticleScientific reports2025
Ethnographic toolstone heat treatment reveals distinctive motives and patterns of material transformation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of heat-treated lithic artifacts via quantitative surface gloss characterization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The heat treatment of rocks to improve their fracture qualities for stone tool production is a key technological innovation of Pleistocene humans. Because the intentionality and technicality of this transformative process are often associated with cognitive prowess, the topic has attracted considerable archaeological research interest worldwide. Yet, with few ethnographic examples, assumptions about archaeological heat treatment are almost always based upon laboratory experiments. Here we report contemporary Konso craft specialists from southern Ethiopia, who represent the last known stone tool makers to regularly heat treat their toolstone. We found that, while material transformations commonly used as indicators of enhanced knappability (e.g., fracture toughness, elastic modulus, improved homogeneity, and newly formed lustre) are discernible in the studied heat-treated toolstones, other qualities of enhanced knappability (e.g., density and hardness) are also informative. Our results highlight the diversity and peculiarity of intentions and mechanisms through which toolstone workability is improved. The motives, techniques, and material transformations involved in Konso toolstone heat treatment afford important insights into various aspects of archaeological heat treatment that are unavailable with experiments alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.