ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of survival prediction tools in early and late onset colorectal cancer patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A machine learning approach to predict treatment response in myofascial pain patients receiving masseter trigger point injections.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting cancer-specific survival in colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and computational prediction models for risk stratification, treatment response, and outcomes in colorectal cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Combination of Naples prognostic score and pathological factors for evaluating the long-term prognosis of patients with late-onset colorectal cancer: a multicenter machine learning study.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to develop online calculators using machine learning models to predict survival probabilities for early- and late-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC and LOCRC) over a 1- to 8-year period. We extracted data on 117,965 CRC patients from the published database spanning 2010 to 2021, divided into training and internal testing datasets. The data of 200 CRC patients from Chongqing Hospital of Jiangsu Province Hospital was used as the external testing dataset. We conducted univariate and multivariate regression analyses on the training dataset to identify key survival factors and develop predictive machine learning models. The models were evaluated using internal and external testing datasets based on AUC, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Web-based calculators were subsequently developed to predict survival curves for EOCRC and LOCRC patients under different treatment strategies. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, 16 and 18 variables were independently significant survival factors for EOCRC and LOCRC, respectively. In the EOCRC group, the machine learning models achieved AUC values of 0.880 and 0.804 in the internal and external testing cohorts. For the LOCRC group, the machine learning models exhibited AUC values of 0.857 and 0.823 in the internal and external testing cohorts. The online calculators, powered by trained machine learning models, are accessible at https://eocrc-surv.streamlit.app/ and https://locrc-surv.streamlit.app/ . These tools estimate survival probabilities for EOCRC and LOCRC patients under various treatment strategies and display the corresponding survival curves post-treatment over the 1- to 8-year period. This study successfully developed online calculators using machine learning algorithms to predict 1- to 8-year survival probabilities for EOCRC and LOCRC patients under various treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.