ReviewLight, science & applications2025
Physical twinning for joint encoding-decoding optimization in computational optics: a review.
Review in Light, science & applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metaoptics merging computational optics and optical computing toward intelligent visual perception.Science advances · 2026Review
- A Review: Absolute Linear Encoder Measurement Technology.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational optics introduces computation into optics and consequently helps overcome traditional optical limitations such as low sensing dimension, low light throughput, low resolution, and so on. The combination of optical encoding and computational decoding offers enhanced imaging and sensing capabilities with diverse applications in biomedicine, astronomy, agriculture, etc. With the great advance of artificial intelligence in the last decade, deep learning has further boosted computational optics with higher precision and efficiency. Recently, there developed an end-to-end joint optimization technique that digitally twins optical encoding to neural network layers, and then facilitates simultaneous optimization with the decoding process. This framework offers effective performance enhancement over conventional techniques. However, the reverse physical twinning from optimized encoding parameters to practical modulation elements faces a serious challenge, due to the discrepant gap in such as bit depth, numerical range, and stability. In this regard, this review explores various optical modulation elements across spatial, phase, and spectral dimensions in the digital twin model for joint encoding-decoding optimization. Our analysis offers constructive guidance for finding the most appropriate modulation element in diverse imaging and sensing tasks concerning various requirements of precision, speed, and robustness. The review may help tackle the above twinning challenge and pave the way for next-generation computational optics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.