ReviewGenome research2025
Evolution of genome-wide methylation profiling technologies.
Review in Genome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Genomics Studies of Psychiatric Disorders in Individuals of Latin American Populations: A Scoping Review.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2026Article
- From Spatial Epigenomes to Clinical Diagnostics: Integrative Methylomics Across Scales and Modalities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The crosstalk between epigenetics and metabolism in the malignant cell.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Ultra-mild bisulphite sequencing for DNA methylation analysis from low-input clinical specimens.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Article
- Cost-effective promoter methylation analysis via target long-read bisulfite sequencing: a case study in severe preterm birth.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
- Methylation profiling in neuropathological tumors diagnosis: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this mini-review, we explore the advancements in genome-wide DNA methylation profiling, tracing the evolution from traditional methods such as methylation arrays and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing to the cutting-edge single-molecule profiling enabled by long-read sequencing (LRS) technologies. We highlight how LRS is transforming clinical and translational research, particularly by its ability to simultaneously measure genetic and epigenetic information, providing a more comprehensive understanding of complex disease mechanisms. We discuss current challenges and future directions in the field, emphasizing the need for innovative computational tools and robust, reproducible approaches to fully harness the capabilities of LRS in molecular diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.