ArticleeNeuro2025
Stabilized Supralinear Network Model of Responses to Surround Stimuli in Primary Visual Cortex.
Article in eNeuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Principles of cortical interactions in modular recurrent networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- State-dependent filtering as a mechanism toward visual robustness.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- The stabilized supralinear network accounts for the contrast dependence of visual cortical gamma oscillations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the mammalian primary visual cortex (V1), there are complex interactions between responses to stimuli present in the cell's classical receptive field (CRF) or "center" and in the surrounding region or "surround." The circuit mechanisms underlying these behaviors are likely to represent more general cortical mechanisms for integrating information. Here, we develop a circuit model that accounts for three important features of surround suppression (suppression of response to a center stimulus by addition of a surround stimulus): (1) The surround stimulus suppresses the inhibitory and excitatory currents that the cell receives; (2) The strongest suppression arises when the surround orientation matches that of the center stimulus, even when the center stimulus orientation differs from the cell's preferred orientation; and (3) A surround stimulus of a given orientation most strongly suppresses that orientation's component of the response to a plaid center stimulus ("feature-specific suppression"). We show that a stabilized supralinear network (SSN) with biologically plausible connectivity and synaptic efficacies that depend on cortical distance and orientation difference between units can consistently reproduce phenomena (1) and (3), and, qualitatively, phenomenon (2). We explain the mechanism behind each result. We argue that phenomena (2) and (3) are independent: the model with some aspects of connectivity removed still produces phenomenon (3) but not (2). The model reproduces the rapid time scale of activity decay observed in mouse V1 when thalamic input to V1 is silenced. Finally, we show that these results hold both in networks with rate-based and conductance-based spiking units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.