Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40228865›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2025

Stabilized Supralinear Network Model of Responses to Surround Stimuli in Primary Visual Cortex.

Dina Obeid, Kenneth D Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Principles of cortical interactions in modular recurrent networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. State-dependent filtering as a mechanism toward visual robustness.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dina ObeidCenter for Theoretical Neuroscience and Swartz Program in Theoretical Neuroscience, College of Physicians and Surgeons and Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York City, NY 10027 dinaobeid@seas.harvard.edu ken@neurotheory.columbia.edu.
Kenneth D MillerCenter for Theoretical Neuroscience and Swartz Program in Theoretical Neuroscience, College of Physicians and Surgeons and Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York City, NY 10027 dinaobeid@seas.harvard.edu ken@neurotheory.columbia.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1433-0647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the mammalian primary visual cortex (V1), there are complex interactions between responses to stimuli present in the cell's classical receptive field (CRF) or "center" and in the surrounding region or "surround." The circuit mechanisms underlying these behaviors are likely to represent more general cortical mechanisms for integrating information. Here, we develop a circuit model that accounts for three important features of surround suppression (suppression of response to a center stimulus by addition of a surround stimulus): (1) The surround stimulus suppresses the inhibitory and excitatory currents that the cell receives; (2) The strongest suppression arises when the surround orientation matches that of the center stimulus, even when the center stimulus orientation differs from the cell's preferred orientation; and (3) A surround stimulus of a given orientation most strongly suppresses that orientation's component of the response to a plaid center stimulus ("feature-specific suppression"). We show that a stabilized supralinear network (SSN) with biologically plausible connectivity and synaptic efficacies that depend on cortical distance and orientation difference between units can consistently reproduce phenomena (1) and (3), and, qualitatively, phenomenon (2). We explain the mechanism behind each result. We argue that phenomena (2) and (3) are independent: the model with some aspects of connectivity removed still produces phenomenon (3) but not (2). The model reproduces the rapid time scale of activity decay observed in mouse V1 when thalamic input to V1 is silenced. Finally, we show that these results hold both in networks with rate-based and conductance-based spiking units.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNerve NetNeuronsPrimary Visual CortexVisual CortexVisual PerceptionAnimalsNeural InhibitionPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40228865
PMCPMC12185980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.