Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40228856›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Effectiveness and safety of the four-step versus six-step milk ladder in children with IgE-mediated cow's milk protein allergy: protocol for an open-label randomised controlled trial.

Daria Wiszniewska, Andrea Horvath, Agata Stróżyk, Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn, Katarzyna Grzela, Hanna Szajewska

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06664918 (Effectiveness and Safety of the 4-Step Versus 6-Step Milk Ladder in Children with IgE-Mediated Cow's Milk Protein Allergy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06664918 narecruitingnot on this map

Effectiveness and Safety of the 4-Step Versus 6-Step Milk Ladder in Children with IgE-Mediated Cow's Milk Protein Allergy: Protocol for an Open-Label Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of WarsawRan2024 to 2029Enrolled92ConditionsCow Milk Allergy, Food AllergyArmsoral food challenge (OFC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daria WiszniewskaDepartment of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1705-1205
Andrea HorvathDepartment of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland andrea.horvath@wum.edu.pl.
Agata StróżykDepartment of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5737-0844
Anna Nowak-WegrzynDepartment of Paediatrics, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA.
Katarzyna GrzelaDepartment of Pediatric Pneumonology and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2876-104X
Hanna SzajewskaDepartment of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntroducing baked milk into the diet of children with cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) has been shown to potentially accelerate the development of tolerance to non-heated milk. However, there is no standardised milk ladder (ML) protocol, and different scientific societies across countries recommend varying versions. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of the four-step ML (4-ML) compared with the six-step ML (6-ML) in children with IgE-mediated CMPA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform an open-label randomised trial with two parallel arms in two departments of the same academic hospital. A total of 92 children with IgE-mediated CMPA will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to introduce cow's milk into their diet according to either 4-ML or 6-ML with a 4-week break period between subsequent steps. Oral food challenge (OFC) with tested products at each subsequent step of the ML will be conducted in hospital settings. The primary outcome will be the percentage of children with tolerance to non-heated cow's milk proteins defined as no allergic reaction to raw cow's milk (120-240 mL depending on the age of the patient) during the last OFC; measured at the end of the 12-week observation period for the 4-ML and 20-week observation period for the 6-ML. Secondary outcomes will include the percentage of children with a negative OFC to each ML step; the percentage of children with anaphylaxis (both those who were treated and those who were not treated with epinephrine); the percentage of children with exacerbation of atopic dermatitis; growth; compliance; and quality of life of the caregivers and parents' anxiety about adverse events during their child's OFC. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The bioethics committee of the Medical University of Warsaw, Poland, approved this protocol (KB/107/2024). The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and submitted to relevant conferences no later than 1 year after data collection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06664918.

Indexed as

Immunoglobulin EMilkMilk HypersensitivityMilk ProteinsAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicImmunoglobulin EMilk ProteinsPaediatric A&E and ambulatory carePAEDIATRICSProtocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID40228856
PMCPMC11997811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.