Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40228851›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Towards a better understanding of NHS secondary and social care backlogs: qualitative perspectives on waiting lists, deferrals and delays by disabled people from minoritised ethnic groups.

Carol Rivas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Carol RivasSocial Research Institute, UCL, London, UK c.rivas@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0316-8090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore how backlogs in health and social care were perceived by and impacted disabled people from minoritised ethnic groups, with a view to improving their experiences and social, health and well-being outcomes.

designInterview and workshop-based qualitative study as part of a larger mixed-methods study; main analysis is based specifically on the interviews.

settingPrimary and secondary care in the UK.

participants271 participants aged 18+ with a chronic condition or impairment associated with disability, white British and from several minoritised ethnic groups, resident in the UK for at least 3 months of the pandemic, using quota sampling to ensure the recruitment of different disability-ethnicity combinations. Four 'key informants' or relevant others by virtue of their work (a medical general practitioner (GP), community leader, charity representative, member of parliament).

main outcome measuresExperiences of care backlogs.

resultsThree distinct categories of care backlog left people suffering for months to years, worsening their condition and attitudes to the National Health Service. These were waiting lists for new patient secondary care (including bottlenecks in GP referrals), deferrals (in patient help-seeking or diagnostic appointments) and delays with existing care plans. Within each category, nuances in experiences, such as feelings of being in limbo when waits and delays were undefined, suggested subcategorisations that are helpful for determining future policy. Disability had more effect on experiences than ethnicity, though an intersection with waiting lists and referral models from other countries was reported.

conclusionsDifferent types of backlog require different government considerations. Work is needed to restore patient confidence and encourage help-seeking, as well as improving access to general practice, to encourage those people to use healthcare who ceased doing so during the pandemic. Referral processes may need substantial reform to remove GP bottlenecks. There should be more transparency about wait times and the way certain conditions are prioritised for patients on long waiting lists or with cancelled appointments. Neglected specialties such as gynaecology and those currently overloaded such as mental healthcare should receive particular support, and alternative services should be considered.

Indexed as

EthnicityHealth Services AccessibilityPersons with DisabilitiesSecondary Health CareState MedicineWaiting ListsAdultAgedCOVID-19FemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationBed OccupancyCapacity BuildingCOVID-19Disabled PersonsHealth ServicesWaiting lists

Identifiers

PMID40228851
PMCPMC11997839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.