Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40228603›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteomics2025

Integrative approaches for predicting protein network perturbations through machine learning and structural characterization.

Bethany D Bengs, Jules Nde, Sreejata Dutta, Yanming Li, Mihaela E Sardiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bethany D BengsDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas, USA.
Jules NdeDepartment of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas, USA.
Sreejata DuttaDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas, USA.
Yanming LiDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas, USA.
Mihaela E SardiuDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas, USA; University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, USA; Kansas Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas, USA. Electronic address: msardiu@kumc.edu.

Funding

Mentoring CoreP20GM103418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Douglas E Wright · 2012 to 2026
$63.0M
Transgenic & Gene-Targeting Shared ResourceP30CA168524 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROY A. JENSEN · 2012 to 2026
$40.1M
Using Integrated Omics to Identify Dysfunctional Genetic Mechanisms Influencing Schizophrenia and Sleep DisturbancesP20GM130423 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Diane E Mahoney · 2019 to 2026
$21.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA168524NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103418NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatin remodeling complexes, such as the Saccharomyces cerevisiae INO80 complex, exemplify how dynamic protein interaction networks govern cellular function through a balance of conserved structural modules and context-dependent functional partnerships, as revealed by integrative machine learning and structural mapping approaches. In this study, we explored the INO80 complex using machine learning to predict network changes caused by genetic deletions. Tree-based models outperformed linear approaches, highlighting non-linear relationships within the interaction network. Feature selection identified key INO80 components (e.g., Arp5, Arp8) and cross-compartment features from other remodeling complexes like SWR1 and NuA4, emphasizing shared functional pathways. Perturbation patterns aligned with biological modules, particularly those linked to telomere maintenance and aging, underscoring the functional coherence of these networks. Structural mapping revealed that not all interactions are predictable through proximity alone, particularly with Arp5 and Yta7. By combining structural insights with machine learning, we enhanced predictions of genetic perturbation effects, providing a template for analyzing cross-species homologs (e.g., human INO80) and their disease-associated variants. This integrative approach bridges the gap between static structural data and dynamic functional networks, offering a pathway to disentangle conserved mechanisms from context-dependent adaptations in chromatin biology. SIGNIFICANCE: By leveraging an innovative, integrative machine learning approach, we have successfully predicted and analyzed perturbations in the INO80 network with good accuracy and depth. Our novel combination of machine learning, perturbation analysis, and structural investigation approach has provided crucial insights into the complex's structure-function relationships, shedding new light on its pivotal roles in affected pathways such as telomere maintenance. Our findings not only enhance our understanding of the INO80 complex but also establish a powerful framework for future studies in chromatin biology and beyond. This work represents a step forward in our understanding of chromatin remodeling complexes and their diverse cellular functions, laying the groundwork for future studies that can further refine our computational approaches and experimental techniques in this field.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProtein Interaction MapsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyHumansINO80 complex, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsChromatin remodelingMachine learningPerturbation networksStatistics

Identifiers

PMID40228603
PMCPMC13181614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.