Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40228255›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2025

Spinal morphological change after posterior lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar spondylolisthesis patients.

Seung-Uk Oh, Jungmin Yi, Sunyoung Moon, Suk Hee Park, Hojin Shin, Jaeho Cho, Young Uk Kim

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seung-Uk OhDepartment of Cardiology, Catholic Kwandong University of Korea College of Medicine, International ST. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
Jungmin YiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University of Korea College of Medicine, International ST. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
Sunyoung MoonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University of Korea College of Medicine, International ST. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
Suk Hee ParkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University of Korea College of Medicine, International ST. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
Hojin ShinEmory University, Atlanta, GA.
Jaeho ChoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea.
Young Uk KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University of Korea College of Medicine, International ST. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lumbar spondylolisthesis is a degenerative status in the spine. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with instrumentation has considered as the standard surgical treatment for lumbar instability. Spinal canal and dural sac cross-sectional area (CSA) has been major parameters for evaluating neurologic symptoms. This study is aimed at finding the radiological change using the dural sac CSA and spinal canal CSA as an objective morphological parameter after PLIF. Of the 74 patients (24 men, 50 women; mean age 66.49 years) who had PLIF surgery were checked for preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI within 1 week after surgery. T2-weighted axial MRI scans were obtained from each patient. We measured the dural sac and spinal canal CSA on an axial MRI image at the center of L4 to L5 intervertebral disc. The average spinal canal CSA was 70.28 ± 27.77 mm2 in the preoperative MR images and 149.59 ± 35.20 mm2 in the postoperative MR images. The average dural sac CSA was 42.46 ± 18.49 mm2 in the preoperative MR images and 98.93 ± 29.32 mm2 in the postoperative MR images. After the PLIF operation, the mean spinal canal CSA was 112.84 percent increase, and the measn dural sac CSA was 132.99 percent increase. After PLIF, patients had significantly higher dural sac CSA (P < .001) and spinal canal CSA (P < .001). Spinal canal CSA have increased by 112.84 percent and Dural sac CSA have increased by 132.99 percent after PLIF. Thus, before PLIF, the treating physician should carefully explain this result to patient.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeSpinal CanalSpinal FusionSpondylolisthesisAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRetrospective Studiescross-sectional arealumbar spondylolisthesismagnetic resonance imagingposterior lumbar interbody fusion

Identifiers

PMID40228255
PMCPMC11999409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.