ReviewMedicine2025
Research hotspots and frontier analysis on Mendelian randomization in osteoporosis-related fields: A review based on bibliometric and visual analysis.
Review in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Cross-Tissue Multiomics Analysis Reveals the Protective Role of TGFBR3 in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.International journal of genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This research seeks to thoroughly examine the present state and research hotspots in Mendelian randomization (MR) in osteoporosis (OP)-related fields, providing a reference for future research directions in this area. Following an exhaustive search of the Web of Science Core Collection database, our analysis utilized citation statistics for osteoporosis studies conducted from January 1, 2007, through March 15, 2024. Bibliometric and visual analyses were conducted using two online analysis systems, CiteSpace and VOSviewer. The analysis included a variety of dimensions, including the distribution of citations, authorship, published journals, year of publication, countries, co-occurrence keywords and keyword clustering. From 2007 to 2024, the number of publications in MR in OP-related fields showed an overall increased. High-impact publications and leading contributors were primarily from China, followed by the USA and England. The journal with the largest number of publications in MR in OP-related fields is the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. Risk factor research, genome-wide associations, meta-analysis, fractures, and gene loci were the main research hotspots. Interdisciplinary integration, MR research combined with data from clinical trials and observational studies, represents the future development trend. Research on MR in OP-related fields has mainly been conducted in China, the USA, and England. The research hotspots were aimed at exploring the causative between risk factors and OP. Future studies are likely to center on multidisciplinary integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.