Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40228241›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2025

Exploring the Potential of a Digital Intervention to Enhance Couple Relationships (the Paired App): Mixed Methods Evaluation.

Catherine Aicken, Jacqui Gabb, Salvatore Di Martino, Tom Witney, Mathijs Lucassen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine AickenSchool of Education, Sport and Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7515-3667
Jacqui GabbFaculty of Arts & Social Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5366-5300
Salvatore Di MartinoSchool of Social Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1648-7365
Tom WitneyInstitute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2695-0605
Mathijs LucassenSchool of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6958-3468

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the effects of poor relationship quality on individuals', couples', and families' well-being, help seeking often does not occur until problems arise. Digital interventions may lower barriers to engagement with preventive relationship care. The Paired app, launched in October 2020, aims to strengthen and enhance couple relationships. It provides daily questions, quizzes, tips, and detailed content and facilitates in-app sharing of question and quiz responses and tagged content between partners.

objectiveTo explore the potential of mobile health to benefit couple relationships and how it may do this, we examined (1) Paired's impact on relationship quality and (2) its mechanisms of action.

methodsThis mixed methods evaluation invited Paired subscribers to complete (1) brief longitudinal surveys over 3 months (n=440), (2) a 30-item web-based survey (n=745), and (3) in-depth interviews (n=20). For objective 1, survey results were triangulated to determine associations between relationship quality measures and the duration and frequency of Paired use, and qualitative data were integrated to provide explanatory depth. For objective 2, mechanisms of action were explored using a dominant qualitative approach.

resultsRelationship quality improved with increasing duration and frequency of Paired use. Web-based survey data indicate that the Multidimensional Quality of Relationship Scale score (representing relationship quality on a 0-10 scale) was 35.5% higher (95% CI 31.1%-43.7%; P=.002), at 7.03, among people who had used Paired for >3 months compared to 5.19 among new users (≤1 wk use of Paired), a trend supported by the longitudinal data. Of those who had used Paired for >1 month, 64.3% (330/513) agreed that their relationship felt stronger since using the app (95% CI 60.2%-68.4%), with no or minimal demographic differences. Regarding the app's mechanisms of action, interview accounts demonstrated how it prompted and habituated meaningful communication between partners, both within and outside the app. Couples made regular times in their day to discuss the topics Paired raised. Daily questions were sometimes lighthearted and sometimes concerned topics that couples might find challenging to discuss (eg, money management). Interviewees valued the combination of fun and seriousness. It was easier to discuss challenging topics when they were raised by the "neutral" app, rather than during stressful circumstances or when broached by 1 partner. Engagement seemed to be enhanced by users' experience of relationship benefits and by the app's design.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates proof of concept, showing that Paired may have the potential to improve relationship quality over a relatively short time frame. Positive relationship practices became embedded within couples' daily routines, suggesting that relationship quality improvements might be sustained. Digital interventions can play an important role in the relationship care ecosystem. The mixed methods design enabled triangulation and integration, strengthening our findings. However, app users were self-selecting, and methodological choices impact our findings' generalizability.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsMobile ApplicationsAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnairesappcouple relationshipscouplesdigital interventiondigital technologyevaluation researchinternet-based interventionmobile phonerelationship qualityromantic relationships

Identifiers

PMID40228241
PMCPMC12001865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.