ArticlePloS one2025
Deep learning models for segmenting phonocardiogram signals: a comparative study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac auscultation requires the mechanical vibrations occurring on the body's surface, which carries a range of sound frequencies. These sounds are generated by the movement and pulsation of different cardiac structures as they facilitate blood circulation. Subsequently, these sounds are identified as phonocardiogram (PCG). In this research, deep learning models, namely gated recurrent neural Network (GRU), Bidirectional-GRU, and Bi-directional long-term memory (BILSTM) are applied separately to segment four specific regions within the PCG signal, namely S1 (lub sound), the systolic region, S2 (dub sound), and the diastolic region. These models are applied to three well-known datasets: PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2016, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MITHSDB), and CirCor DigiScope Phonocardiogram.The PCG signal underwent a series of pre-processing steps, including digital filtering and empirical mode decomposition, after then deep learning algorithms were applied to achieve the highest level of segmentation accuracy. Remarkably, the proposed approach achieved an accuracy of 97.2% for the PhysioNet dataset and 96.98% for the MITHSDB dataset. Notably, this paper represents the first investigation into the segmentation process of the CirCor DigiScop dataset, achieving an accuracy of 92.5%. This study compared the performance of various deep learning models using the aforementioned datasets, demonstrating its efficiency, accuracy, and reliability as a software tool in healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.