Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40228180›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Complex networks applied to political analysis: Group voting behavior in the Brazilian congress.

Tiago José de Oliveira Toledo Junior, Diego Raphael Amancio, Roseli Aparecida Francelin Romero

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tiago José de Oliveira Toledo JuniorInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5675-554X
Diego Raphael AmancioInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
Roseli Aparecida Francelin RomeroInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Senate and the Chamber of Deputies constitute the Brazilian Congress and are responsible for the Brazilian legislative management. Complex networks were shown to be a suitable tool to analyze this type of system. Several researches explored party dynamics in the Chamber of Deputies, however, no attention has been given to the Senate. Previous works that have stated the necessity of a backbone extraction methodology to be used in these types of networks also failed to define an automatic backbone extraction methodology to uncover group structure in legislative networks, reverting to heuristics or subjective approaches. In this work, we explore both legislative houses and compare them to see their differences and similarities. We also systematize an automatic backbone extraction methodology. Further, we expand on previous analyses by bringing spectrum and government x opposition analysis based on voting data. Our results show that the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies have behaved differently during major events in Brazil over the second decade of the century. From the obtained results it is fair to say that the dynamics for both houses are different and that the best backbone extraction algorithm varies over time and is different for each house.

Indexed as

PoliticsAlgorithmsBrazilHumansVoting

Identifiers

PMID40228180
PMCPMC11996218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.