ArticleJournal of experimental botany2025
Species-specific phylloplane responses to changes in external pH.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plant stress physiology: safeguarding food security in a changing climate.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The leaf surface, known as the phylloplane, represents the initial point of contact for plants in their interactions with the above-ground environment. Although previous research has assessed how leaves respond to variations in external pH, particularly in the context of acid rain, there remains a limited understanding of the molecular mechanisms through which plants detect, respond to, and mitigate cellular damage. To examine plant responses to changes in external pH, we selected five species known to have a range of phylloplane pH values from alkaline to acidic under normal conditions, and investigated the response of the phylloplane pH to treatments at pH 6.5, 4, and 2. We found that plants were able to modify their phylloplane pH, and that this buffering ability was species-specific; however, only Gossypium species displayed strong buffering. When leaves were exposed to either pH 6.5 or pH 4, the Gossypium species alkalinized the phylloplane pH to slightly higher values than the dry control pH but, remarkably, when leaves were exposed to pH 2, they buffered the pH to 6 within 5 min. Transcriptional analysis further indicated that the responses to external pH changes varied among the five species, with differentially expressed genes associated with Ca2+-signaling pathways as well as Ca2+- and H+-ATPases pumps being highlighted. These findings also suggested that pH stress affected photosynthesis, and that both wetness and moderate pH shifts might trigger additional abiotic and biotic stress-signaling pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.