ArticleeLife2025
Somatodendritic orientation determines tDCS-induced neuromodulation of Purkinje cell activity in awake mice.
Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Cerebellar rhythms: mechanisms, functions and translational opportunities.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
- Polarity-dependent modulation of sensory circuits by cerebellar tDCS: local and distant effects.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The potential role of transcranial direct current stimulation in experimental ischemic stroke in adult male albino rats.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Ionic Direct Current Enables Millimeter- and Millisecond-Scale Cortical Gain Control in vivo.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Polarity-dependent modulation of sensory circuits by cerebellar tDCS: local and distant effects.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- EFMouse: A toolbox to model stimulation-induced electric fields in the mouse brain.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Somatodendritic orientation determines tDCS-induced neuromodulation of Purkinje cell activity in awake mice.eLife · 2025Article
- Optimising Electrode Montages in Conventional Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum for Pain Modulation.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Cerebellar Transcranial AC Stimulation Produces a Frequency-Dependent Bimodal Cerebellar Output Pattern.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
- Inkjet-printed transparent electrodes: Design, characterization, and initial in vivo evaluation for brain stimulation.PloS one · 2025Article
- Modulating excitation/inhibition balance through transcranial electrical stimulation: physiological mechanisms in animal models.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Transsynaptic modulation of cerebellar nuclear cells: theta AC-burst stimulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Cerebellar Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: A Frontier in Chronic Pain Therapy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) of the cerebellum is a promising non-invasive neuromodulatory technique being proposed for the treatment of neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. However, there is a lack of knowledge about how externally applied currents affect neuronal spiking activity in cerebellar circuits in vivo. We investigated how Cb-tDCS affects the firing rate of Purkinje cells (PC) and non-PC in the mouse cerebellar cortex to understand the underlying mechanisms behind the polarity-dependent modulation of neuronal activity induced by tDCS. Mice (n=9) were prepared for the chronic recording of local field potentials (LFPs) to assess the actual electric field gradient imposed by Cb-tDCS in our experimental design. Single-neuron extracellular recording of PCs in awake (n=24) and anesthetized (n=27) mice was combined with juxtacellular recordings and subsequent staining of PC with neurobiotin under anesthesia (n=8) to correlate their neuronal orientation with their response to Cb-tDCS. Finally, a high-density Neuropixels recording system was used to demonstrate the relevance of neuronal orientation during the application of Cb-tDCS in awake mice (n=6). In this study, we observe that Cb-tDCS induces a heterogeneous polarity-dependent modulation of the firing rate of PCs and non-PC in the mouse cerebellar cortex. We demonstrate that the apparently heterogeneous effects of tDCS on PC activity can be explained by taking into account the somatodendritic orientation relative to the electric field. Our findings highlight the need to consider neuronal orientation and morphology to improve tDCS computational models, enhance stimulation protocol reliability, and optimize effects in both basic and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.