ReviewEpigenomics2025
Understanding epigenetic regulation in the endometrium - lessons from mouse models with implantation defects.
Review in Epigenomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Transcriptomic Profiling of Mouse Endometrium Across the Estrous Cycle Reveals Phase-Specific Regulatory Networks Underlying Cyclic Remodelling.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- The Impact of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals on Embryonic Recurrent Implantation Failure: A Narrative Review.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial function, crucial for successful embryo implantation, is significantly influenced by epigenetic regulation. This review investigates the crucial roles of DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin remodeling, and RNA methylation in endometrial receptivity and implantation, based on a survey of recent literature on knockout mouse models with implantation defects. These models illuminate how epigenetic disruptions contribute to implantation failure, a significant human reproductive health concern. DNA methylation and histone modifications modulate endometrial receptivity by affecting gene silencing and chromatin structure, respectively. Chromatin remodeling factors also play a critical role in endometrial dynamics, influencing gene expression. Furthermore, RNA methylation emerges as critical in implantation through transcriptional and translational control. While human studies provide limited epigenetic snapshots, mouse models with suppressed epigenetic regulators reveal direct causal links between epigenetic alterations and implantation failure. Understanding these epigenetic interactions offers potential for novel therapies addressing reproductive disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.