Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40228002›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2025

An Efficient Single-Person Technique for Milk Sampling from Laboratory Mice.

Huyen Le, Malcolm Watford

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huyen LeDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers -The State University of New Jersey; Rutgers Center for Lipid Research, Rutgers -The State University of New Jersey.
Malcolm WatfordDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers -The State University of New Jersey; Rutgers Center for Lipid Research, Rutgers -The State University of New Jersey; watford@sebs.rutgers.edu.

Funding

Adipocyte glutamine production and lactationR21HD108496 · NICHD · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI WATFORD, MALCOLM · 2022 to 2023
$429k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD108496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rodent models have been widely used in biology since the early 20th century to study basic physiology and biochemical mechanisms. In lactation and neonatal development research, there is a need to sample milk to determine the composition and how milk may be affected by experimental manipulations, thereby impacting newborn development. Collecting biofluids in sufficient amounts from small rodents can be difficult. Several studies have demonstrated different techniques to obtain milk from mice. However, these techniques often require at least two trained personnel, which may be challenging in some cases.  Here, we demonstrate a modified milk sampling technique based on a method published in 2009. With this affordable and easy-to-assemble method, one trained person can routinely obtain 0.1-0.5 mL of milk from a dam under anesthesia in less than 10 min. Using this method, we collected sufficient milk on post-delivery day 2 (PD2) and post-delivery day 10 (PD10). We measured milk macronutrient components and compared them with the existing literature to validate our collection method.  We recorded that on PD2, milk protein averaged at 70.1 ± 5.2 g/L, milk fat was 174.4 ± 7.1 g/L, and milk lactose was 12.3 ± 0.6 g/L. On PD10, while milk lactose and protein remained at similar concentrations as on PD2, milk fat was significantly higher (224.4 ± 17.1 g/L). We also observed that the relative abundance of individual milk proteins varied between PD2 and PD10. More specifically, αS1-casein and whey acidic protein were higher, while β-casein was lower at PD10 compared with PD2. Overall, we demonstrate an efficient single-person technique for milk sampling from mice using a device that can easily be assembled with commonly used laboratory equipment.

Indexed as

MilkAnimalsFemaleMice

Identifiers

PMID40228002
PMCPMC13693551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.