ArticleCancers2025
The Decline and Fall of the Current Chemotherapy Paradigm in Soft Tissue Sarcoma.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunotherapy-based salvage therapy in advanced soft tissue sarcoma after first-line chemotherapy: a retrospective single-center analysis with emphasis on undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- TRANSPIRE-DRP: a deep learning framework for translating patient-derived xenograft drug response to clinical patients via domain adaptation.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesDespite conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy treatments, soft tissue sarcoma continues to remain a terminal diagnosis for most patients. Numerous chemotherapeutic agents have been trialed in soft tissue sarcoma, with marginal improvement in overall survival. Novel therapeutic approaches are needed to improve outcomes for this entity.
methodsthe literature was reviewed, including a summary of pertinent adjuvant/neoadjuvant clinical trials and trials for metastatic disease.
resultsChemotherapeutic agent use in adjuvant/neoadjuvant trials provided limited if any evidence of the benefit of chemotherapy in this space. Despite multiple trials in the metastatic space, novel chemotherapeutic agents appear to have limited long-term benefits for the management of soft tissue sarcoma. Suggestions for further research, particularly with neoadjuvant clinical trials, were made.
conclusionsChemotherapy remains an inadequate treatment option for soft tissue sarcoma, and novel therapies are needed. The neoadjuvant space provides an excellent opportunity to study the effects of innovative treatments in soft tissue sarcoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.