ReviewCancers2025
The Persistent Power of the Taxane/Platin Chemotherapy.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Chemotherapy backbone and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations across solid tumors: a pan-tumor network meta-analysis.The oncologist · 2026Pooled it
- Mechanism-Based Strategies for Prevention of Taxane-Induced Hair Follicle Damage in Cancer Chemotherapy.Cancers · 2026Review
- Repurposing Itraconazole in Combination with Chemotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor for Cancer.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Drug Release, Entrapment Efficacy, and Drug Loading Capacity of Taxanes Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLNs).Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cancer chemotherapy regimen of a taxane and platinum combination was developed more than forty years ago, yet remains the cornerstone of treatment for several major cancer types today. Although many new agents targeting cancer genes and pathways have been developed and evaluated, none have been sufficient to replace the long-established taxane/platinum combination. This leads us to ponder why, after four decades of colossal efforts, multiple discoveries, and tremendous advances in understanding gene mutations and biology, the development of conceptually superior targeted therapies has not yet achieved overwhelming success in replacing cytotoxic chemotherapy. The concept of targeted therapy is based on the idea that blocking the altered pathway(s) crucial for cancer development (and maintenance), the disturbance in cellular signaling, metabolism, and functions will make the targeted cancer cells unfit and trigger programmed cell death in cancer cells, but without the significant side effects that limit chemotherapy. We propose that the lack of anticipated triumphs of targeted therapy stems from the desensitization of programmed cell death pathways during neoplastic transformation and malignant progression of cancer cells. This renders the targeting drugs largely ineffective at killing cancer cells and mostly insufficient in clinical implements. Recent advances in understanding suggest that, in contrast to targeted therapies, taxanes and platinum agents kill cancer cells by physical rupturing nuclear membranes rather than triggering apoptosis, making their effect independent of the intrinsic cellular programmed cell death mechanism. This new recognition of the non-programmed cell death mechanism in the success of chemotherapeutic agents, such as taxanes and platinum, may inspire oncologists and cancer researchers to focus their efforts more productively on developing effective non-programmed cell death cancer therapies to replace or significantly improve the application of the current standard taxane/platinum regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.