ReviewCancers2025
Technical Feasibility of Microwave Ablation in Pancreatic Tumors: A Scoping Review of Procedural Efficacy and Safety.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Ultrasound for the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Perspectives.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Explore the efficacy of microwave ablation combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesPancreatic cancer remains one of the most aggressive and lethal malignancies, with limited effective treatment options for advanced stages. Microwave Ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive therapeutic modality, offering potential benefits in tumor control. This review aims to critically assess the safety and efficacy of MWA in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, focusing on its application in various pancreatic lesions.
methodsWe systematically reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2023 that evaluated the use of MWA in pancreatic tumors, including locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), and pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Due to limited data on survival rates and long-term outcomes, our analysis concentrated primarily on the technical aspects and immediate procedural outcomes of MWA.
resultsMWA was technically feasible in all cases. The overall complication rate was approximately 16.7% (nine patients), with higher incidences in tumors located in the pancreatic head. Reported complications included pancreatitis and pseudocyst formation. Procedural parameters varied, with applied energy ranging from 20 to 80 watts and ablation times between 2 to 15 min, depending on the microwave generator type and approach (percutaneous, intraoperative or endoscopic). All cases demonstrated effective necrosis of the target tissue, and several studies reported notable tumor size reductions, averaging up to 70%.
conclusionsMWA shows promise as a therapeutic option for pancreatic cancer, achieving high technical success rates and significant tumor reductions. However, the procedure is associated with a moderate complication rate, particularly in tumors located in the pancreatic head.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.