ArticleCancers2025
Correlation Between Body Mass Index and Immunotherapy Response in Advanced NSCLC.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic Impact of Body Mass index in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- Correction: Shalata et al. Correlation Between Body Mass Index and Immunotherapy Response in Advanced NSCLC.Cancers · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Therapeutic Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Management of Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Impact of Statin Use on Immunotherapy Outcomes and Efficacy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Body mass index and fasting insulin predict survival and EGFR-TKI benefit in Stage IV lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Emerging evidence suggests a potential association between elevated body mass index (BMI) and enhanced ICI efficacy, yet this relationship remains inconclusive and warrants further investigation. This study aims to evaluate the impact of BMI on treatment efficacy and survival outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients treated with first-line ICI therapy.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted at a multi-center registry to evaluate the impact of baseline BMI on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with stage IV NSCLC who received first-line ICI therapies. Treatment regimens included pembrolizumab or the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab, administered either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, at the oncology department between January 2018 and December 2023. BMI was categorized according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, and OS and PFS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the Cox proportional hazards regression model.
resultsAmong 346 patients, 12.72% were underweight, 45.38% normal weight, 29.19% overweight, and 12.72% obese. Overweight and obese patients were more likely to receive pembrolizumab (
conclusionsBMI was not an independent predictor of survival outcomes in advanced NSCLC treated with ICI. Incorporating BMI with other patient-specific factors into personalized immunotherapy strategies highlights the importance of tailored approaches to improve patient care and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.