ReviewCancers2025
Histotripsy of Liver Tumors: Patient Selection, Ethical Discussions, and How We Do It.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Review
- Research progress on the antitumor immune regulation mechanisms and combined treatment strategies of histotripsy: A review.Medicine · 2026Review
- The Potential and Challenges of Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Therapies in the Management of Liver and Biliary Tract Cancers.Cancers · 2026Review
- Early adoption of image-guided histotripsy therapy in interventional oncology: challenges and opportunities in the United Kingdom.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Histotripsy for liver tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current clinical evidence.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Advances in Hepatobiliary Surgery: Diagnosis, Prognosis, Management and Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Histotripsy of Liver Metastases: Short-Term Safety and Imaging Findings.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
- Review
- Surgery Without Scalpel: Histotripsy as a Non-Invasive and Non-Thermal Modality for Liver Tumor Ablation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver malignancies, both primary and metastatic tumors, are a major cause of cancer-related mortality. Colorectal cancer alone results in liver metastases in nearly 50% of patients, with approximately 85% presenting with unresectable disease. Similarly, hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma frequently present at advanced stages, limiting curative options. Systemic therapies provide modest survival benefits, underscoring the need for alternative treatments. Locoregional approaches, such as thermal ablation and chemoembolization, while effective, have notable limitations, including invasiveness, peri-procedural risks, and the requirement to interrupt systemic treatments. Histotripsy is a novel, non-invasive method that uses focused ultrasound-induced cavitation to enable precise tumor ablation without heat or radiation. Our institution utilizes a multidisciplinary tumor board approach to evaluate patients for histotripsy, particularly in cases involving unresectable disease, complex surgical candidacy, palliative intent related to disease control and symptom management, or as bridging therapy for transplantation. Early results, including preclinical data and the THERESA and #HOPE4LIVER trials, highlight its efficacy in treating liver tumors with minimal complications. This review outlines institutional protocols for histotripsy, covering pre- and post-procedural management, along with ethical considerations of current treatment paradigms. As a patient-centered approach, histotripsy offers a novel treatment option with a favorable safety profile and compatibility with systemic therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.