ReviewPediatric radiology2025
Practical approach to using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for pre-surgical planning in complex paediatric congenital heart disease.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unveiling ccTGA complexity: CMR and 3D modelling for surgical planning-a case series.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decision-making in complex congenital heart disease (CHD) is challenging and requires the integration of anatomic and physiological data. Recent advances in cross-sectional imaging, particularly cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have refined this process. In addition to anatomic detail, MRI provides quantitative physiological data on cardiac function and flows through volumetry and phase contrast assessment. This review outlines the current scope for cardiac MRI and aims to provide a practical framework for using the data in four structural anomalies: borderline left ventricle, double outlet right ventricle, congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries and Ebstein anomaly of the tricuspid valve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40227499What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.