ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025
Femoral bone growth predictions based on personalized multi-scale simulations: validation and sensitivity analysis of a mechanobiological model.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational mechanobiological model combining epiphyseal, apophyseal, and appositional growth and inner bone remodeling of the juvenile femur.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Age-Dependent Susceptibility to Mechanical Unloading-Induced Femoral Morphological Changes and Patellar Instability in a Rat Model.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026Article
- Ontogenetic changes in femoral morphology and joint loads in children.Bone & joint research · 2026Article
- Foot progression angle modifications alter hip joint contact forces and femoral growth plate mechanics in children.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Prediction accuracy of femoral and tibial stress and strain using statistical shape and density model-based finite element models in paediatrics.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musculoskeletal function is pivotal to long-term health. However, various patient groups develop torsional deformities, leading to clinical, functional problems. Understanding the interplay between movement pattern, bone loading and growth is crucial for improving the functional mobility of these patients and preserving long-term health. Multi-scale simulations in combination with a mechanobiological bone growth model have been used to estimate bone loads and predict femoral growth trends based on cross-sectional data. The lack of longitudinal data in the previous studies hindered refinements of the mechanobiological model and validation of subject-specific growth predictions, thereby limiting clinical applications. This study aimed to validate the growth predictions using magnetic resonance images and motion capture data-collected longitudinally-from ten growing children. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to refine model parameters. A linear regression model based on physical activity information, anthropometric data and predictions from the refined mechanobiological model explained 70% of femoral anteversion development. Notably, the direction of femoral development was accurately predicted in 18 out of 20 femurs, suggesting that growth predictions could help to revolutionize treatment strategies for torsional deformities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.