ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Biophysical modeling and artificial intelligence for quantitative assessment of anastomotic blood supply in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Indocyanine green in intestinal endometriosis surgery: a multicenter evaluation of anastomotic safety.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Observational
- Fluorescence-guided surgery in colorectal cancer: current evidence, quantitative advances, and future perspectives.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Review
- Beyond fluorescence intensity: a Minimum acquisition and reporting standard and emerging technologies for colorectal indocyanine green fluorescence angiography studies.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Its Role in Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFluorescence imaging is critical for intraoperative intestinal perfusion assessment in colorectal surgery, yet its clinical adoption remains limited by subjective interpretation and lack of quantitative standards. This study introduces an integrated approach combining fluorescence curve analysis, biophysical modeling, and machine learning to improve intraoperative perfusion assessment.
methodsLaparoscopic fluorescence videos from 68 low rectal cancer patients were analyzed, with 1,263 measurement points (15-20 per case) selected along colonic bands. Fluorescence intensity dynamics were extracted via color space transformation, video stabilization and image registration, then modeled using the Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC) algorithm and nonlinear least squares fitting to derive biophysical parameters. Three clinicians independently scored perfusion quality (0-100 scale) using morphological features and biophysical metrics. An XGBoost model was trained on these parameters to automate scoring.
resultsThe model achieved superior test performance, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.47, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.99, and an R
conclusionThis framework synergistically enhances surgical evaluation through three innovations: (1) Biophysical modeling quantifies perfusion dynamics beyond time-based parameters; (2) Machine learning integrates multimodal data for surgeon-level accuracy; (3) Automated workflow enables practical clinical translation. By addressing limitations of visual assessment through quantitative, rapid, and generalizable analysis, this method advances intraoperative perfusion monitoring and decision-making in colorectal surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40227485What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.