Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40227472›Full record

ArticleCancers2025

Single-Port Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Using the Single-Port Robotic System via the Subcostal Approach: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Jun Hee Lee, Byung Mo Gu, Hyeong Hun Song, You Jin Jang, Hyun Koo Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jun Hee LeeDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 08308, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6592-6483
Byung Mo GuDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 08308, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9632-6803
Hyeong Hun SongDepartment of Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
You Jin JangDivision of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 08308, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Koo KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 08308, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7604-4729

Funding

from the Korea-US Collaborative Research Fund (KUCRF), funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT and the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea RS-2024-00466887Korea University Guro Hospital (Korea Research-driven Hospital) grant O2411541Korea University Medicine grant K2407621 and K2405731the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea RS-2024-00436472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) has gained global popularity. Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that RAMIE results in reduced operative times and a greater number of dissected lymph nodes compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). This study provides an initial analysis of single-port (SP) robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (SRAMIE) using the SP robotic system via the subcostal approach. The primary objective is to examine perioperative outcomes of SRAMIE compared to multi-port RAMIE (MRAMIE) using the Xi robotic system and video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (VAE).

methodsIn this retrospective study, patients who underwent MIE at a single center between February 2017 and December 2024 were analyzed. Patients were divided into SRAMIE (

resultsThe SRAMIE group did not experience conversions to thoracotomy or VAE. Compared with VAE, SRAMIE resulted in significantly shorter chest tube duration (

conclusionsSRAMIE is a feasible approach offering advantages over VAE in recovery and postoperative pain. The comparable perioperative outcomes suggest that SRAMIE may be a viable alternative to conventional MIE, warranting further large-scale studies.

Indexed as

da Vinci single-port robotic systemesophageal neoplasmesophagectomyrobot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomysingle port

Identifiers

PMID40227472
PMCPMC11988000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.