ArticleUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Urodynamics in Germany: Indications and Application in Urological Hospital and Practice Settings].
Article in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrodynamic studies (UDS) are an established diagnostic tool in urology. However, international studies, including those from Germany, indicate a decline in their use. This trend may be attributed to guideline adjustments and changes in indications.
objectiveThe study aims to analyse the current practice and distribution of indications for UDS in urological clinics and practices in Germany. MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween March 2023 and October 2023, 259 urological clinics and a representative sample of 280 outpatient urologists nationwide were surveyed about their UDS procedures. Data on methods, personnel and indications were collected.
resultsIn all, 80% of clinics and 44% of practices participated. 58% of clinics performed fewer than 100 UDS annually. Only 15% of practices performed UDS themselves. Common procedures such as uroflowmetry (99%) and cystometry (98%) are widely implemented, whereas video urodynamics (53%) are less frequent. The most common indications in clinics are neurogenic bladder dysfunction (24%), overactive bladder (21%) and female stress incontinence (19%). Practices showed similar trends, with neurogenic bladder dysfunction (30%) and overactive bladder (26%) as primary indications. University hospitals and specialized centres performed UDS more often for complex conditions, while non-university clinics frequently addressed stress incontinence.
conclusionDespite declining numbers, UDS remain central to urological diagnostics. Indication patterns vary by clinic type. These results provide insights into the application of UDS in Germany and underline its important role in urological diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.