Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40227373›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025

Changes in bone density, microarchitecture, and biomechanical properties after plate removal in surgically treated distal radius fractures: a prospective study.

Arastoo Nia, Stefan Hajdu, Gerhild Thalhammer, Silke Aldrian, Domenik Popp, Lukas Schmölz, Thomas Haider, Dieter Pahr, Alexander Synek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arastoo NiaUniversity Clinic for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. arastoo.nia@meduniwien.ac.at.
Stefan HajduUniversity Clinic for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gerhild ThalhammerUniversity Clinic for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Silke AldrianUniversity Clinic for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Domenik PoppUniversity Clinic for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lukas SchmölzUniversity Clinic for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas HaiderUniversity Clinic for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Dieter PahrInstitute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander SynekInstitute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRemoval of volar locking plates after healing of a distal radius fracture is becoming increasingly common. However, it is unclear how the fracture healing proceeds and which defects remain. The aim of this study was to assess changes in bone microarchitecture and biomechanical properties in surgically treated radius fracture after volar locking plate removal.

methodsTwelve patients were recruited after undergoing plate removal. High Resolution Quantitative Computed Tomography (HR-pQCT) was used to perform scans of the fractured and contralateral distal radius on average one (M1) and 16 months (M2) after plate removal. Parameters measured were cortical- (Dcomp), trabecular- (Dtrab) and total bone density (D100), as well as cortical thickness (Ct.Th). Axial bone stiffness (FE.Kaxial) was determined through linear micro-finite element analysis (µFEA).

resultsAt M1, no significant differences between fractured and contralateral side were detected except for Dcomp. At the fractured side, all parameters except for Dtrab increased significantly between M1 and M2. At M2, Ct.Th and FE.Kaxial were significantly higher at the fractured side compared to the contralateral side, but Dcomp remained significantly lower. Qualitatively, closure of the screw holes was observed between M1 and M2, while large trabecular defects remained.

conclusionBone (re)modeling at the distal radius is an ongoing process even after plate removal and leads to a partial exaggeration of the bone properties relative to the intact contralateral side. It seems that the bone regains its biomechanical competence by closing screw holes and increasing cortical thickness, which compensates for trabecular defects that cannot be repaired. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Bone DensityBone PlatesDevice RemovalFracture Fixation, InternalRadiusRadius FracturesAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFracture HealingHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone mineral densityFracture healingHR-pQCTmicro–Finite Element AnalysisRadius fracture

Identifiers

PMID40227373
PMCPMC12075015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.