ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025
Arthroscopic cystectomy and open surgery for the treatment of popliteal cysts: a retrospective clinical cohort study.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Double posteromedial portal arthroscopy vs. other arthroscopic techniques for Baker's cyst: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the clinical effects of arthroscopic cystectomy and open surgery for the treatment of popliteal cysts, in order to provide clinical basis for the selection of surgical plan for popliteal cyst.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 153 patients diagnosed with popliteal cysts from January 2020 to December 2022. Among them, 77 patients underwent arthroscopic cystectomy as the observation group, and 76 patients underwent open surgery as the control group. Compared the surgical related indicators, Rauschening and Lindgren grade, Lysholm and VAS scores between two groups. Follow up on postoperative complications and cyst recurrence.
resultsThe observation group had a smaller incision length (P < 0.01), less intraoperative bleeding (P < 0.05), and shorter hospitalization time than the control group (P < 0.01), but longer surgical time (P < 0.05). Both groups of patients showed significant improvement in Rauschening and Lindgren grade, Lysholm and VAS scores after surgery, with the observation group superior to the control group(P < 0.05&P < 0.01). Follow up for 13-25 months (16.34 ± 4.25) after surgery showed no complications in the observation group, while there were two cases of nerve injury in the control group, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). There were two cases of postoperative recurrence in the observation group with no symptoms and nine cases of recurrence in the control group with mild symptoms and did not require further treatment, which had statistical difference (P < 0.05).
conclusionsArthroscopic cystectomy and oper surgery both have definite clinical efficacy in treating popliteal cyst, which relying on prospective research to determine the optimal solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40227372What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.