ArticleNeuroradiology2025
Early neurological deterioration after endovascular treatment for acute stroke with mild symptoms.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts hemorrhagic transformation after endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Admission Inflammatory-Metabolic Biomarker Profiles and Outcome-Specific Prognostic Patterns After Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEndovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with mild symptoms (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score of ≤ 5) has a specific concern about early neurological deterioration (END) after the procedure, but its significance remains unclear. This study aims to examine the prognostic impact and characteristics of END in this patient population.
methodsWe conducted a post-hoc analysis of the Japan Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 4, enrolling 13,479 patients who underwent EVT for AIS at 166 participating centers between 2015 and 2019. We included patients with AIS and NIHSS scores ≤ 5 and compared outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score at 30 days) between patients with and without END after EVT. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to explore associations between END and outcomes and risk factors for END.
resultsOf 503 patients analyzed, 66 (13%) developed END. Patients who developed END had a lower proportion of mRS scores of 0-2 at 30 days than the No-END group (17% vs. 80%, P < 0.0001), with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.11). Mortality within 30 days was higher among patients with END (9.1% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.0001). A multivariable logistic regression model identified that factors associated with END included age ≥ 75 years (adjusted OR 3.67; 95% CI, 1.78-7.55), ASPECTS (adjusted OR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97), NIHSS scores before EVT of 0-2 compared with those of 3-5 (adjusted OR 2.11; 95% CI, 1.04-4.25), and unsuccessful recanalization (adjusted OR 8.39; 95% CI, 3.90-18.0).
conclusionEND after EVT for AIS with mild symptoms was relatively common and associated with worse outcomes. Risk stratification for END and successful recanalization would be crucial, particularly for EVT candidates with mild symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.