Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40227228›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025

Global Transcriptional Complexity of Estrogen Receptor-Low Positive Breast Cancers in the Prospective Swedish Population-Based SCAN-B Cohort.

Siker Kimbung, Srinivas Veerla, Kadum Muhammad, Anna Ehinger, Johan Vallon-Christersson, Martin Malmberg, Niklas Loman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Siker KimbungDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7001-8367
Srinivas VeerlaDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7328-6239
Kadum MuhammadLund University Cancer Center, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0009-0440-9587
Anna EhingerDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9225-7396
Johan Vallon-ChristerssonDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2195-0385
Martin MalmbergLund University Cancer Center, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9500-8982
Niklas LomanDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1425-5189

Funding

Avtal om Läkarutbildning och ForskningFru Berta Kamprads Stiftelse (Mrs. Berta Kamprad Foundation) FBKS 2022-35 and FBKS-2020-9Gunnar Nilssons Cancerstiftelse (Gunnar Nilsson Cancer Foundation) GN-2022-7-283Vetenskapsrådet (VR) 2018-00522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is uncertainty whether estrogen receptor (ER)-low tumors with 1% to 10% IHC staining of nuclei represent a distinct molecular biological entity of breast cancer, posing significant challenges for their clinical management and the development of novel therapies. We aimed to elucidate ER-low tumor biology. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe analyzed primary breast tumors included in the Swedish population-based Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast (SCAN-B) cohort, 2% (n = 174) of which were classified as ER-low. Transcriptional patterns, tumor inflammatory infiltration, and prognosis were compared between ER-low versus ER-negative (ER-neg; 0%) and ER-positive (ER-pos; >10%) tumors.

resultsThe transcriptomes of ER-low and ER-neg tumors remarkably overlapped, displaying predominantly nonluminal PAM50 subtypes and downregulated ER signaling. All triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) molecular subtypes were represented within ER-low/HER2-negative breast cancer. Unsupervised clustering algorithms failed to segregate ER-low/HER2-negative from TNBC tumors, and only two genes showed significant differential expression above a 1.5-fold difference between the groups. However, borderline ER-low tumors (with exactly 10% ER) were mostly assigned labels associated with luminal disease biology, suggesting possible endocrine responsiveness. Lymphocyte infiltration was comparable between ER-low and ER-neg but was significantly higher relative to ER-pos tumors. Within ER-low/HER2-negative disease, hormone receptor positivity and low/intermediate PAM50 risk of recurrence score inferred from RNA sequencing data and lymphocyte fraction ≥30% were respectively associated with a better prognosis.

conclusionsER-low/HER2-negative is not a distinct breast cancer molecular biological entity but an integral part of TNBC, deserving similar treatments. Nonetheless, a few borderline cases with moderately active ER signaling can potentially respond to endocrine therapies. Hormone receptor-related signatures and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes may stratify ER-low/HER2-negative tumors according to the risk of recurrence. The true benefit of endocrine therapies in ER-low breast cancer requires prospective investigation.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsReceptors, EstrogenTranscriptomeTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesSwedenBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID40227228
PMCPMC12209827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.