Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40227194›Full record

ArticleAustralasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists2025

Explicating the implicit: An Australian medical student's reflection on the Perspectives of Psychiatry Program for International Learners (PoPPIL).

Allen J Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Allen J HuangAdelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0009-0000-8709-9389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundMedical schools are essential in promoting psychiatry as an appealing career, especially amid workforce shortages and prevailing negative perceptions that deter interest in the field. Research suggests that increasing mentorship opportunities and access to enrichment programs and electives can significantly improve attitudes towards psychiatry, encouraging more to consider it as a career path.ObjectiveTo reflect on an Australian medical student's experience in the Perspectives of Psychiatry Program for International Learners (PoPPIL) at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, demonstrating how the program, based on its structured multi-perspective framework, serves as an example of an enrichment activity that aligns with these recommendations.ConclusionThe PoPPIL serves as a compelling model for integrating enrichment activities and mentorship within psychiatric education. Participants engage in discourse-driven learning, encouraging reflection on diagnostic formulations and explication of inherent reasoning processes. By establishing its foundations on an adaptable, conceptually sound framework, the PoPPIL aims to facilitate the development of psychiatrists who are holistic and integrative in their daily practice. Integrating educational opportunities such as these into Australia's psychiatric curricula may prove advantageous for future generations.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCareer ChoicePsychiatryStudents, MedicalAustraliaCurriculumHumansMentorsearly career psychiatryJohns HopkinsPerspectives of Psychiatrypsychiatric education and trainingreflection

Identifiers

PMID40227194
PMCPMC12138151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.