ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Depth-Related Visuomotor Performance in Keratoconus and Its Relationship to Stereopsis.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reduced Image Quality Impairs Monocular Blur-Driven Accommodation in Keratoconus.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Motor Skill Deficits and Associated Factors in Childhood Intermittent Exotropia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- The Impact of Induced Optical Blur on Monocular and Binocular Depth-Related Visuomotor Task Performance.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purposes of this study were to quantify the impact of degraded binocularity in keratoconus and its improvement with rigid contact lenses on a depth-related visuomotor task that emulates complex activities in daily living; and to determine whether visuomotor performance may be predicted from psychophysical estimates of stereo threshold. Methods: Participants were instructed to pass a metal loop around a wire convoluted in depth. Error rate and speed were measured in 26 controls, 30 cases with keratoconus with best-corrected spectacles, a subset of 17 cases with rigid contact lenses, and 10 uncorrected myopes with acuity and stereo thresholds comparable to the keratoconic cohort. Stereo thresholds were determined using random-dot stimuli. Results: Binocular error rates were lower than monocular error rates for controls, uncorrected myopes, and the better-performing half of cases (p < 0.001, for each), but not for the worst-performing half (p = 0.07). Error rates in cases improved with contact lenses (p < 0.001). Within each cohort, the error rate was poorly correlated with the stereo threshold (r2 < 0.12, for each). Monocular speeds were significantly lower than binocular speeds for controls than for cases (p = 0.003) and for uncorrected myopes than cases (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Degraded binocularity in keratoconus may limit the ability to perform depth-related visuomotor tasks. A portion of this loss may be overcome by using rigid contact lenses. The attributes of visuomotor task performance are, however, not predictable from the psychophysical estimates of stereo thresholds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.