ArticleFamily practice2025
Australian practice nurses' perspectives on integrating specialist diabetes care with primary care: a qualitative study.
Article in Family practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn 2015, the Australian Diabetes Alliance Program (DAP) was implemented in the Hunter New England Local Health District, New South Wales as a collaboration with the Hunter Medicare Local. DAP integrates specialist teams within primary care practices, delivering case conferencing, practice performance reviews, and education sessions.
objectiveTo report on practice nurses (PNs) perspectives on the impact of the DAP on their skills, knowledge, and approach in delivering care for adults with type 2 diabetes.
methodsThree primary care practices with high rates of monitoring haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (> 90% of patients annually) and three practices with lower rates of monitoring HbA1c levels (< 80% of patients annually) from DAP provided the sampling frame. Interviews were conducted with six PNs, which were transcribed and analysed using codebook thematic analysis.
resultsOverall, DAP was viewed favourably by PNs. Significant improvements in knowledge and skills were reported relating to administering antihyperglycemic agents, insulin, and other injectable therapy, as well as dietary modifications for diabetes management. PNs transferred this knowledge and skills to other patients not participating in DAP. An improvement in the delivery of diabetes care, rather than a change in approach, was also reported by PNs. However, the amount of preparation required for case conferencing in the program was identified as a burden to PNs.
conclusionsPNs were supportive of DAP and identified knowledge gains that were transferable to other patients. The administrative burdens on PNs need to be considered for scalability of the program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.