ArticleEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2025
Responsiveness of European countries to the population mental health needs: A cross-national comparison study.
Article in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of mental health help-seeking in Europe: a systematic review based on the behavioural model of health services use.International journal of mental health systems · 2026Review
- First-incidence of common mental disorders now and 12 years ago: Results from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Studies (NEMESIS).European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to cross-compare European countries' responsiveness to their populations' mental health (MH) needs.
methodsFor the EU-27 countries and the United Kingdom, the 2023 Headway Initiative collected data on 15 key performance indicators (KPIs) in responsiveness in healthcare, including workforce, facilities, quality of care, and MH expenditure, and 14 KPIs in responsiveness in workplaces, schools, and society. Bivariate correlations between Headway-transformed KPI scores, which were standardised in a 1-10 Likert Scale (1: worst performance; 10: best performance), tested for putative associations.
resultsResponsiveness in healthcare: Sweden (10), Denmark (8.8), and Finland (8.3) showed the best performance, while Romania (1.0), Slovakia (1.1), and Latvia and Bulgaria (1.2) had the poorest performance. Responsiveness in workplaces: schools, and society, Germany (10.0), France (9.1), and Denmark (9.1) were the most responsive countries, while Greece and Slovakia (1.0) had the poorest responsiveness. MH status total scores negatively correlated with global scores on responsiveness in healthcare (
conclusionsEuropean countries significantly differed in their responsiveness to the populations' MH needs, although the real effectiveness of their MH policies remains to be elucidated. Whether more responsive countries, which achieved poorer MH outcomes, successfully met greater preexisting MH needs, they failed to do so, or the relationship is driven by other third variables (e.g., quality of MH assessment) requires future investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.