Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40226816›Full record

ArticleRadiology research and practice2025

Independent Evaluation of a Commercial AI Software for Incidental Findings of Pulmonary Embolism (IPE) on a Large Hospital Retrospective Dataset.

S Ambrogio, I Verdon, B Laureano, K V Ramnarine, F Fedele, D Vilic, I Honey, E Barton, C Goncalves, Sze Mun Mak and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

S AmbrogioDepartment of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1571-0016
I VerdonDepartment of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
B LaureanoDepartment of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
K V RamnarineDepartment of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
F FedeleDepartment of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
D VilicDepartment of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
I HoneyDepartment of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
E BartonDepartment of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
C GoncalvesDepartment of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Sze Mun MakDepartment of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
H ShuaibDepartment of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
A JacquesDepartment of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID40226816
PMCPMC11991795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.