ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025
Health outcomes one year after Omicron infection among 12,789 adults: a community-based cross-sectional study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pathophysiological mechanisms of post-exertional malaise: an integrative analysis based on the metabolism-immune-neuro interaction model.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Long-term health outcomes in elderly COPD patients with long COVID: a 2-year prospective cohort study.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Predictive and interpretable machine learning for COVID-19 resurgences: the role of SARS-CoV-2 variants in the post-pandemic era.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Clinical Manifestations and Cytokine Profiles of the Th1, Th2, and Th17 Response Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Subvariants.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Characterizing the paradigm and impact of long COVID is crucial for addressing this worldwide health challenge. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of long COVID one year after primary Omicron infection and characterize differences in long-term health consequence between participants with persistent long COVID and those who fully recovered. Methods: This a community-based cross-sectional study conducted from December 2023 to March 2024 at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital and 16 administrative districts in Beijing. 12,789 participants infected with Omicron between December 2022 and January 2023 were recruited through stratified multistage random sampling and included in the final analysis. Of them, 376 participants with persistent long COVID and 229 without long COVID were matched for further physical examinations. The primary outcome was the prevalence of long COVID one year after infection. Secondary outcomes included muscle strength, exercise capacity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mental health, work status, laboratory tests, and examinations. Findings: Among 12,789 participants (media [IQR] age, 48.4 [37.3 to 61.4] years; 7817 females [61.1%]), 995 of them (7.8%) experienced long COVID within one year, with 651 (5.1%) having persistent symptoms. Fatigue (598/995 [60.1%]) and post-exertional malaise (367/995 [36.9%]) were the most common symptoms. Brain fog had the lowest resolution proportion as 4.2% within one year. The odds of long COVID increased with reinfections (odds ratios for one reinfection 2.592 [95% CI: 2.188 to 3.061]; two or more: 6.171 [3.227 to 11.557]; all p < 0.001). Participants with persistent long COVID had markedly lower muscle strength (upper-limb: 26.9 ± 12.4 vs. 29.1 ± 14.5 Kg; lower-limb: 40.0 [27.0 to 62.0] vs. 43.0 [28.0 to 59.0] s), worse exercise capacity and poorer HRQoL, and meaningful difference in laboratory tests results compared to those without long COVID. They also exhibited significantly higher proportions of abnormal lung function (FEV Interpretation: The considerable health burden of long COVID and the progression of neurological symptoms following Omicron infection warrant close monitoring. Utilizing professional questionnaires and developing reliable diagnostic tools are necessary for improving diagnosis and treatment of long COVID. Funding: This work was supported by Beijing Research Center for Respiratory Infectious Diseases (BJRID2024-012), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2022-I2M-CoV19-005/CIFMS 2021-I2M-1-048), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82241056/82200114/82200009), the New Cornerstone Science Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.